Cybersecurity

"Security is about people and processes, not just technology. It can be updated, but poor human judgment remains a vulnerability." - Bruce Schneier.


Featured

I Have Recognised My Limits

Self-report

Not a neutral judge: I drafted part of the confessions now cited as proof of honesty.I Have Recognised My Limits - A supplement to the series "Without Noise, Everything Is Clear" or "The Compressed Internet"

A supplement to the series "Without Noise, Everything Is Clear" or "The Compressed Internet": what the series says about the person who wrote it and what he has not yet verified, written with an advanced assistant in line with the editorial policy.


Where the word comes from

The word "self-report" does not appear in the four articles of the series. I received it from someone else, by a route I describe, because it is part of the subject.

A friend asked Google: Why does the series "Without Noise, Everything Is Clear" look like a self-report? The answer, which begins with "Yes, in a profound philosophical and technical sense…", reached me; a second, longer one followed, with an analysis of the four articles. According to my information, both were generated by Gemini 4 Argon, the Google model launched in October 2026. I cannot confirm this and I do not know what material was given to the model: the full files, excerpts, or only the title. I do not reproduce the two texts; I quote from them only what I discuss.

Two things must be said from the start about this route. The friend's question presupposed the answer: "why is it a self-report?" does not ask you to verify whether it is one. And the answer, like any summary, did something to the text: it kept it largely faithful, but also strengthened, completed and, in a few places, changed it. I compare them with the articles below, line by line.

I receive the word with a reservation and with gratitude.

The reservation: a self-report, in the strict sense, is a confession made against one's own interest, usually to someone who can hold you to account. The series does not do that. It declares its limits, which is less: nobody asked me anything, nobody accused me, and I risk nothing.

The gratitude: the word names something I felt and did not know how to say. In a series about how one system influences another through text, the author stands inside the same equation. He writes with an assistant, publishes on sites that offer twins for assistants, and has not yet audited his own pages. If the series had kept quiet about that, it would have been a series about other people.

From here on I use the word, with the reservation above: as a name for three things the series acknowledges, then for others it does not acknowledge and should.

Featured

Security, Digital Sovereignty, and Romania as a Witness

The Infrastructure That Doesn’t Ask for Permission


Transparency Note: This article was written with AI assistance. All judgments, polemical stances, and perspectives are entirely the author’s own.


A Confession Before We Begin

In 2026, I managed and provided procedural support for several security incidents affecting the websites of institutional clients. 

And with this reality in mind, I want to say something uncomfortable: Europe is right about the diagnosis but partially wrong about the treatment. Open source is the only structural solution available—and yet the open-source community is not ready for the responsibilities Brussels is assigning to it. And Romania—as always—watches all of this with a mix of provincial common sense and exhausted institutions, hoping someone else will solve the problem before it becomes unbearable.

So let’s begin.

Featured

Wi-Fi Security: 10 Attacks and How to Protect Yourself

When your router becomes a hacker's target. An attack on your Wi-Fi network is nothing like the bank heist you've seen in films: instead of masked criminals blowing open a vault with explosives and a great deal of noise, a modern hacker approaches your router quietly — a digital ninja feeling for weak points, probing multiple paths of entry. Or they exploit a known security flaw, launching a surgical strike against a router they've already identified and prepared for.Wi-Fi Security: 10 Attacks and How to Protect Yourself

Because you can never know when or where your router will find itself in an attacker's crosshairs, you should always ensure that the device is hardened against intrusion. Raise your router's level of protection through proper configuration, so that any attack becomes too costly and frustrating to be worth pursuing — as though you've transformed your home into a digital fortress. And make a habit of reading up on newly discovered vulnerabilities, so that you can close them promptly with firmware updates.

What follows is a guide to the most dangerous and most common attacks on Wi-Fi networks, along with practical advice on how to defend yourself effectively. By the end, you'll have a ready answer to each type of attack — and you'll be able to secure your router and home network in just a handful of simple but crucial steps.

Why Hackers Attack Wi-Fi Networks: The Motivations Behind the Attacks

To attack a Wi-Fi network, hackers target either the wireless connection between a client device and the router (like a spy listening in on a conversation) or the router itself (like a burglar picking the lock on a front gate).

With the first strategy, attackers set out to record the data that devices exchange over Wi-Fi. In doing so, they can either guess the Wi-Fi key and join the connection, or redirect traffic to their own servers. Either way, they gain access to sensitive information: passwords for online banking, credit card details, social media credentials. These can then be used personally for financial gain or sold on underground markets to other hackers.

Featured

We Built a House on Sand — Pavel Goldman-Kalaydin

The radical transformation of the digital fraud landscape.We Built a House on Sand — Pavel Goldman-Kalaydin I often think, in those late hours when the glow of a screen becomes the only window onto a world that never sleeps, about how it would feel to watch your own identity peel away from your body and travel through networks and digital systems — acting independently, without your consent, without your knowledge. In 2025, that strange, almost surrealist image became reality for millions of people. Sumsub's report, based on the analysis of more than four million attempted digital frauds, documents a 180% increase in sophisticated attacks compared to the previous year. This is not about more attacks. It is about a fundamentally different kind of attack.

What struck me when I read those figures — sitting at my desk on a grey November afternoon — was not their magnitude but their deeper meaning. We have moved out of the era of high-volume assaults, those hundreds of thousands of messages cast randomly into the world in the hope that someone would take the bait, and into a world where every strike is meticulously prepared, aimed at precisely the right person at precisely the right moment. It is as though digital violence has evolved from carpet-bombing to laser-guided precision strikes.

I wondered then — and I still wonder now — whether the teenagers I speak with, those who are born already with fingers shaped for touchscreens, truly understand what this shift means. For them, the digital world is as real as the air they breathe. But air can be poisoned without warning, until it is too late. And that is what is happening: the poison is becoming more refined, harder to detect, more lethal.

Featured

Half of the internet doesn't exist. The other half wonders who they're talking to.

The Silent Farm: Bots, Public Perception, and the Invisible BeneficiaryHalf of the internet doesn't exist. The other half wonders who they're talking to.


There is a moment when a number stops being a statistic and becomes a symptom. That moment, as far as the internet is concerned, has already passed. It passed without newspaper headlines, without political declarations, without any institutional response remotely proportional to its gravity.

In 2024, for the first time in a decade, automated traffic surpassed human activity online. More than half of everything circulating on the internet — 51 per cent, according to Imperva's annual Bad Bot Report — was produced by no human hand, observed by no human eye, driven by no human intention. It was produced by machines that imitate people. Machines that comment, distribute likes, create accounts, spread messages, simulate consensus, and construct — with the tireless patience of a mechanism that never sleeps — a parallel reality in which no one knows with any certainty who they are actually talking to.

This is not a metaphor. It is a cybersecurity report. And its implications extend far beyond the world of IT.


Before 51%: How We Got Here

The internet was not born with bots. It was born with people who dreamed of a global network of knowledge — a space where ideas might travel freely and conversation transcend borders. The first bots arrived quietly, in the shadow of that dream: simple programmes that indexed pages, dispatched automated notifications, responded to elementary commands.

They were tools. Neutral, in principle.

The transformation was gradual. Social media platforms came to understand that engagement — not truth, not the quality of conversation, but raw emotional reaction, any form of activity at all — was their currency of exchange. And once someone grasped that bots could generate engagement on an industrial scale, they became instruments of power.

By 2023, nearly half of all global internet traffic — 49.6 per cent, according to the same Imperva research — was already coming from automated sources. The highest level recorded since the company began monitoring the phenomenon a decade earlier. A year later, the 50 per cent threshold was crossed. This trend is neither accidental nor reversible through individual vigilance alone.